Canon's new EOS RP wants to lure enthusiasts looking for something a little less chunky. It's a mirrorless equivalent of the EOS 6D Mark II DSLR, boasting an aggressively competitive price and, for its class, an impressively lightweight body.

The body goes for only $1,300 (£1,400, AU$2,100), and comes in a kit with the RF 24-105mm f4 L lens for $2,400 (£2,330, no kit in Australia). At those prices, it's competing with older models that have experienced price drops over the years, most notably the Sony A7 II.

Because Canon doesn't have any inexpensive lenses for the RF system, though, that kit price puts it in competition with the recent Sony A7 III and its (admittedly meh) 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 lens. But the A7 III has more flexible video options, better battery life, faster continuous shooting and in-body image stabilization.

There are some RF lenses on the 2019 roadmap, namely:

That last one -- not part of Canon's "L" professional line -- will likely be the cheap lens for a future kit, so I'd expect a less-expensive kit choice by holiday shopping season rather than in time for the RP's Feb. 27 initial availability (you can preorder now, though). But 24-240mm is a nice comprehensive focal range for an all-in-one lens.

One pricing oddity, at least in the US: The 24-105mm lens is currently on sale for $900 on Canon's site, making it cheaper to buy the body and lens separately than as a kit. And at full price, the kit costs the same as buying the lens and body separately. Normally, a kit costs less than the sum of its parts.

You can, of course, use existing EF-mount lenses with the RP, as you can with its big brother, the EOS R. The RP doesn't come bundled with the adapter, though, so that will cost you another $100. And the EF lenses are bigger, which diminishes some of the advantages of the smaller body.

The RP looks like the EOS R from the front, but has Canon's more consumer-oriented control layout on the top and a different location for the viewfinder's eye sensor. It's smaller than the EOS R, but still larger than Sony's A7 models. 

What we do like about the camera so far is just how light it is -- at just over a pound (485 grams), you'll hardly feel it in your hands if you're used to DSLRs. (Early leaked specifications put it at an absurdly light 14 ounces (400 grams), but that's without the battery and SD card.) But Canon can cut the weight because it doesn't use in-body image stabilization; expect the OIS lenses to weigh it down a bit.

You may not care about the tradeoffs Canon makes for the low price, but there are a few. At the top is the awful battery life: It's rated at 250 shots, which is worse than the original Sony A7's, which everyone complained about. Continuous shooting speed only hits 4 frames per second with continuous autofocus and autoexposure. 

4K UHD recording tops out at 24 fps and it doesn't support Canon's C-Log profile. While the updated Digic 8 image processor should eke some improved image quality out of the 26.2-megapixel sensor it inherits from the 6D Mark II, it's still an unimpressive sensor compared with the A7 II. And Canon's still an optical-stabilization-only holdout.